|
Post by darkgreenmeme on Jul 16, 2016 21:33:50 GMT
Schafter LWB (armored) 6:06.095 97.25 mph
This run was a little weak, but it did break my previous personal record. Wasn't as fast as the regular Schafter?
|
|
|
Post by darkgreenmeme on Jul 17, 2016 2:38:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by pondnewt on Jul 17, 2016 14:54:31 GMT
Managed to just get a time under 6 minutes with the Huntley S.
|
|
|
Post by darkgreenmeme on Jul 21, 2016 8:58:59 GMT
Schafter V12 (armored) 5:17.880 112.00 mph
only 6 seconds off from my Zentorno time!?
|
|
|
Post by pondnewt on Jul 21, 2016 16:03:25 GMT
The Schafter V12 is the fastest sports car in the game on a long straight so I guess it is very well suited to a track like this and is probably on par with (or better than) a lot of the super cars that have been in the game since the early days.
On another note am I right in thinking that perhaps for many of the vehicles you've used for this challenge you don't have them fully upgraded? I ask as on some occasions I've felt that I've beaten your time when I maybe didn't deserve to. For example the other night I beat your Sadler time by a few seconds but I didn't save the video as I had a few accidents and felt I could do better. I was surprised though that I still got a better time than you so I thought that maybe it is just because my Sadler is fully upgraded whereas your vehicle didn't have any performance upgrades added to it?
|
|
|
Post by darkgreenmeme on Jul 21, 2016 16:08:01 GMT
The Schafter V12 is the fastest sports car in the game on a long straight so I guess it is very well suited to a track like this and is probably on par with (or better than) a lot of the super cars that have been in the game since the early days. On another note am I right in thinking that perhaps for many of the vehicles you've used for this challenge you don't have them fully upgraded? I ask as on some occasions I've felt that I've beaten your time when I maybe didn't deserve to. For example the other night I beat your Sadler time by a few seconds but I didn't save the video as I had a few accidents and felt I could do better. I was surprised though that I still got a better time than you so I thought that maybe it is just because my Sadler is fully upgraded whereas your vehicle didn't have any performance upgrades added to it? They all are fully upgraded. Some of my videos aren't perfect runs, I put them out there just to have a time to beat. I think there's one or two collisions in my normal Schafter run, so that's why the time is off.
|
|
|
Post by darkgreenmeme on Jul 22, 2016 1:43:51 GMT
|
|
|
Post by darkgreenmeme on Jul 24, 2016 3:31:34 GMT
Bodhi 6:36.626 89.77 mph
|
|
|
Post by darkgreenmeme on Jul 24, 2016 3:33:12 GMT
Blazer 6:38.696 89.30 mph
|
|
|
Post by pondnewt on Jul 24, 2016 12:23:26 GMT
|
|
|
Post by darkgreenmeme on Jul 25, 2016 7:29:26 GMT
My very first run with Winston's brand new bike: Cliffhanger 5:20.052 111.24 mph pondnewt - this slightly beats your time with the Gargoyle, I wonder which is the faster bike?
beaten by 5:13.577 113.54 mph
|
|
|
Post by pondnewt on Jul 25, 2016 15:55:10 GMT
Yes two very similar times. I don't have a Cliffhanger myself to test but I think Broughy may have ranked them both around 5th or 4th for the motorcycles class so perhaps they are very similar performance wise. Can't remember for sure though if I have that right.
|
|
|
Post by darkgreenmeme on Jul 28, 2016 18:15:16 GMT
Bagger 6:14.909 94.97 mph
|
|
|
Post by darkgreenmeme on Jul 29, 2016 21:14:35 GMT
I just set a time with the Dubsta 6x6 which I think may be the first vehicle to be represented here in the thread from the offroad class. Bertha just beat Lexi with her D6x6 by 3 seconds: Dubsta 6x6 6:04.200 97.76 mph
|
|
|
Post by darkgreenmeme on Jul 29, 2016 21:20:10 GMT
My initial time trial with the Contender:
Contender 5:46.480 102.76 mph (94% of top speed)
|
|